Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,733 questions · 1,794 findings · 326 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 243 · 13.5%GRADE not reported 96 · 5.4%Very low 597 · 33.3%Low 506 · 28.2%Moderate 303 · 16.9%High 49 · 2.7%

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 48 participants
Very low

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Cognitive functioning: Attaining normal cognitive functioning ‐ Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Global functioning: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Adverse events: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 50 participants
Very low

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Service Use: Not reported · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)

Leaving the study early · Adolescents with psychosis

STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU showed no clear difference in leaving the study early: For any reason compared with HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.71 [0.25, 2]
1 study · 60 participants
Low

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Global state: Average endpoint score HoNOSCA (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Cognitive functioning: clinically important change Not attaining normal cognitive function (Memory Digit Span) · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) changes cognitive functioning: clinically important change Not attaining… compared with TAU (all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.58 [0.37, 0.89]
1 study · 31 participants
Very low

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Cognitive function: average endpoint score** · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Level of functioning · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Adverse events: Clinically important change · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Hospital admissions · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Leaving the study early · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) changes leaving the study early: For any reason compared with COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.33 [0.27, 20.09]
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Global functioning: Average endpoint VABS Score (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 50 participants
Very low

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Adverse events: Clinically important effect · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Hospital admissions · Adolescents with psychosis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU

Leaving the study early · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) changes leaving the study early: For any reason compared with TAU (all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.93 [0.32, 2.71]
2 studies · 91 participants
Very low

GROUP PSYCHOSOCIAL THERAPY (GPT) + TAU vs TAU

Global state: Average endpoint score CGAS (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis

1 finding from 1 review

Psychological interventions for psychosis in adolescents 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 56 participants
Very low