Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in painful intercourse ‐ De novo dyspareunia compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in bladder function ‐ Stress incontinence compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).
Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in painful intercourse ‐ Dyspareunia compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).
Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).
Vaginal procedure showed no clear difference in intraoperative Visceral injury compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in bladder function ‐ Stress urinary incontinence compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (low certainty).
Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in painful intercourse ‐ Dyspareunia compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (low certainty).
Absorbable showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse compared with non absorbable sutures (moderate certainty).
Absorbable showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with non absorbable sutures (high certainty).
Absorbable showed no clear difference in visceral injury ‐ Bladder compared with non absorbable sutures (moderate certainty).
Absorbable showed no clear difference in suture/mesh exposure compared with non absorbable sutures (low certainty).