Premature LH surge ‐ Own oocytes ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
GRADE not reported
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy sensitivity analysis ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ own oocytes ‐ early phase stimulation protocol ‐ frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in live birth or ongoing pregnancy sensitivity analysis ‐ PCOS… compared with gnRH antagonists; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy ‐ Poor‐responders (MPA 10 mg versus GnRH… compared with gnRH antagonists (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestagen showed no clear difference in live birth or ongoing pregnancy compared with gnRH agonist (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestagen showed no clear difference in clinical Pregnancy compared with gnRH agonist (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogen 1 showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy ‐ Normo‐responders (MPA 10 mg versus… compared with progestogen 2 (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy ‐ Poor‐responders (MPA 10 mg versus GnRH antagonists) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol · assisted reproduction technology cycles
Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in live birth or ongoing pregnancy ‐ Poor‐responders (MPA 10 mg versus… compared with gnRH antagonists; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Cumulative pregnancy rate · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
GRADE not reported
Premature LH surge ‐ Donor oocytes ‐ Normoresponders ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Fresh embryo transfer · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase (primary analysis) · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase (sensitivity analysis) · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes clinical pregnancy: early (EFP) vs late (LFP) follicular phase… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
It is very uncertain whether intentional endometrial injury changes live birth or ongoing pregnancy (sensitivity analysis) compared with no intervention or a sham procedure (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
2 findings from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Live birth or ongoing pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Clinical pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle (primary analysis) · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Clinical pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle (sensitivity analysis) · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes clinical pregnancy: prior cycle vs IUI cycle (sensitivity analysis) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Multiple pregnancy rate · women undergoing assisted reproduction
It is very uncertain whether dopamine agonist plus co‐intervention changes multiple pregnancy rate compared with co‐intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Clinical pregnancy rate · women undergoing assisted reproduction
Dopamine agonist showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy rate compared with other active intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Multiple pregnancy rate · women undergoing assisted reproduction
Dopamine agonist showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy rate compared with other active intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review