Frequency of incontinence episodes · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence
1 finding from 1 review
Objective measurement of volume of incontinent episodes · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Resource implications (e.g. cost of incontinence management methods) · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life measurements · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cure: number of women with self‐reported continence · women with stress urinary incontinence
Electrical stimulation showed no clear difference in cure: number of women with self‐reported continence compared with pelvic floor muscle training (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI (cured or improved) · women with stress urinary incontinence
Electrical stimulation showed no clear difference in improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI… compared with pelvic floor muscle training (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects · women with stress urinary incontinence
Electrical stimulation showed no clear difference in adverse effects compared with pelvic floor muscle training (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Cost‐effectiveness · women with stress urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Participants with improvement in urgency urinary incontinence · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
It is very uncertain whether electrical stimulation changes participants with improvement in urgency urinary incontinence compared with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OAB‐related quality of life · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
Participants cured or improved · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
Participants with improvement in urgency urinary incontinence · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
Electrical stimulation showed no clear difference in participants with improvement in urgency urinary incontinence compared with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus biofeedback (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OAB‐related quality of life · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
1 finding from 1 review
Participants cured or improved · Adults with overactive bladder (OAB)
Electrical stimulation probably leads to higher participants cured or improved compared with pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Participants cured or improved · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Objective measure of urine leakage (e.g. pad test) ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found