Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

143 questions · 143 findings · 6 reviews · Incontinence

No studies found 50 · 35%GRADE not reported 22 · 15.4%Very low 33 · 23.1%Low 32 · 22.4%Moderate 6 · 4.2%High 0 · 0%

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and standard urotherapy vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with electromyographic biofeedback and standard urotherapy

Objective measurement of volume of incontinent episodes · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and standard urotherapy vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with electromyographic biofeedback and standard urotherapy

Resource implications (e.g. cost of incontinence management methods) · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and standard urotherapy vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with electromyographic biofeedback and standard urotherapy

Adverse effects · children aged 5 to 16 years with daytime urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Low intensity ES plus PFMT vs maximal intensity ES plus PFMT

Improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI (cured or improved) · women with stress urinary incontinence

Low intensity ES plus PFMT may leads to lower improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI… compared with maximal intensity ES plus PFMT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review