Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,288 questions · 3,354 findings · 516 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 720 · 21.5%GRADE not reported 164 · 4.9%Very low 950 · 28.3%Low 932 · 27.8%Moderate 434 · 12.9%High 154 · 4.6%

More frequent (less than eight hours) vs less frequent (eight hours or greater) monitoring of gastric residual volume

Pneumonia · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube

It is very uncertain whether more frequent (less than eight hours) changes pneumonia (until discontinued or up to 28 days) compared with less frequent (eight hours or greater) monitoring of gastric… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

No monitoring vs frequent monitoring (12 hours or less) of gastric residual volume

Mortality (at the end of · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube

It is very uncertain whether no monitoring changes mortality (at the end of compared with frequent monitoring (12 hours or less) of gastric residual volume (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

No monitoring vs frequent monitoring (12 hours or less) of gastric residual volume

Pneumonia · adults receiving EN via nasogastric or gastrostomy tube

It is very uncertain whether no monitoring changes pneumonia (until discontinued or up to 28 days) compared with frequent monitoring (12 hours or less) of gastric residual volume (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, first part · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… changes sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, first part compared with gastric carcinoma (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Sensitivity analysis, only esophageal and GE‐junction cancer participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… led to lower sensitivity analysis, only esophageal and GE‐junction cancer… compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma vs gastric carcinoma

Sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, second part · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma

Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… probably leads to lower sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, second part compared with gastric carcinoma (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hearing loss prevention programme vs audiometric testing (hearing loss)

Hearing loss STS ≥ 10 dB hearing loss average over 2, 3, 4 kHz in either ear · agricultural students without hearing loss

Hearing loss prevention programme showed no clear difference in hearing loss STS ≥ 10 dB loss average over 2, 3, 4 kHz in either ear compared with audiometric testing (hearing loss) (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Maintenance fluids vs restricted fluids

Severe neurological sequelae ‐ acute (within the first 4 weeks) · children with acute bacterial meningitis

Maintenance fluids showed no clear difference in severe neurological sequelae ‐ acute (within the first 4 weeks) compared with restricted fluids (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Maintenance fluids vs restricted fluids

Severe neurological sequelae ‐ chronic (after the first 4 weeks) · children with acute bacterial meningitis

It is very uncertain whether maintenance fluids changes severe neurological sequelae ‐ chronic (after the first 4 weeks) compared with restricted fluids (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction vs Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

Anastomotic leakage · people undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction changes incidence of anastomotic leakage compared with roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction vs Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

Incidence of bile reflux · people undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction changes incidence of bile reflux compared with roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction vs Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

Incidence of remnant gastritis · people undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction changes incidence of remnant gastritis compared with roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction vs Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

Incidence of oesophagitis · people undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction changes incidence of oesophagitis compared with roux‐en‐Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction vs Billroth II reconstruction after distal gastrectomy

Major postoperative complications · people undergoing distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Uncut Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction changes major postoperative complications compared with billroth II reconstruction after distal gastrectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review