Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,805 questions · 2,912 findings · 307 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 706 · 24.2%GRADE not reported 133 · 4.6%Very low 786 · 27%Low 696 · 23.9%Moderate 474 · 16.3%High 117 · 4%

Intervention not reported

Anthropometric outcomes: number of children with normal or underweight WHZ on discharge Defined as WHZ > −2 (Hussain 2021) · children aged > 6 months and ≤ 5 years with wasting

The intervention showed no clear difference in anthropometric outcomes: number of children with normal or… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Anthropometric outcomes: number of children with WHZ in moderate wasting range on discharge Defined as WHZ between −3 and −2 (Hussain 2021) · children aged > 6 months and ≤ 5 years with wasting

The intervention showed no clear difference in anthropometric outcomes: number of children with WHZ in moderate… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Anthropometric outcomes: number of children with WHZ in severe wasting range on discharge Defined as WHZ < −3: Hussain 2021 · children aged > 6 months and ≤ 5 years with wasting

The intervention showed no clear difference in anthropometric outcomes: number of children with WHZ in severe… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Anthropometric outcomes: number of children with MUAC ≥ 115 mm on discharge (Hussain 2021) · children aged > 6 months and ≤ 5 years with wasting

The intervention showed no clear difference in anthropometric outcomes: number of children with MUAC ≥ 115 mm on… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Anthropometric outcomes: weight gain per day (g/kg/day) Calculated as ((discharge weight − admission weight)/weight on admission)/days in treatment among recovered children (Hussain 2021) · children aged > 6 months and ≤ 5 years with wasting
1 finding from 1 review

Homeopathic medicinal products (non‐individualised treatment) vs placebo or usual care

Adverse events · children aged up to 16 years with ARTIs

It is very uncertain whether homeopathic medicinal products (non‐individualised treatment) changes adverse events compared with placebo or usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Homeopathic medicinal products (individualised treatment) vs placebo or usual care

Recurrence of ARTI · children aged up to 16 years with ARTIs

Homeopathic medicinal products (individualised treatment) showed no clear difference in recurrence of ARTI compared with placebo or usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Homeopathic medicinal products (individualised treatment) vs placebo or usual care

Days off work for parents · children aged up to 16 years with ARTIs

Homeopathic medicinal products (individualised treatment) showed no clear difference in days off work for parents compared with placebo or usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review