Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

200 questions · 203 findings · 8 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

No studies found 82 · 40.4%GRADE not reported 10 · 4.9%Very low 25 · 12.3%Low 37 · 18.2%Moderate 35 · 17.2%High 14 · 6.9%

Summary of findings: Aminosalicylates vs placebo

Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Aminosalicylates probably leads to higher acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Endorectal balloon changes acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Endorectal balloon changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Diarrhoea (grade 1+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 1+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (Vaizey scale) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review