Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

218 questions · 223 findings · 14 reviews · Implants and prosthodontics

No studies found 30 · 13.5%GRADE not reported 165 · 74%Very low 22 · 9.9%Low 4 · 1.8%Moderate 2 · 0.9%High 0 · 0%

One-stage augmentation (implants placed simultaneously) vs Two-stage augmentation (delayed implant placement)

Prosthesis failure · Patients with insufficient bone below the maxillary sinus requiring dental implants

One-stage augmentation (implants placed simultaneously) showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with two-stage augmentation (delayed implant placement); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

One-stage augmentation (implants placed simultaneously) vs Two-stage augmentation (delayed implant placement)

Complications · Patients with insufficient bone below the maxillary sinus requiring dental implants

One-stage augmentation (implants placed simultaneously) showed no clear difference in complications compared with two-stage augmentation (delayed implant placement); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site vs No augmentation

Prosthesis failure · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites)

Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site led to lower prosthesis failure compared with no augmentation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site vs No augmentation

Implant failure · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites)

Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site led to lower implant failure compared with no augmentation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site vs No augmentation

Major complications at the implant/donor site · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites)

Autogenous bone graft augmentation at the immediate implant site led to lower major complications at the implant/donor site compared with no augmentation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

ARP with alloplast vs Extraction alone

Aesthetic outcomes of future prosthodontic rehabilitation · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

ARP with alloplast vs Extraction alone

Changes in bucco-lingual/palatal width of alveolar ridge (mm) · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

ARP with alloplast vs Extraction alone

Need for additional augmentation prior to implant placement · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

ARP with alloplast vs Extraction alone

Changes in vertical height of alveolar ridge (mm) · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…

It is very uncertain whether ARP with alloplast changes changes in vertical height of alveolar ridge (mm) compared with extraction alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

ARP with alloplast vs Extraction alone

Complications (e.g. discomfort, pain and swelling) · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more…
1 finding from 1 review

NobelActive external connection implants vs NobelActive internal connection implants

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

NobelActive external connection implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with nobelActive internal connection implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Ankylos Plus (Dentsply) implants vs Seven (Sweden & Martina) implants

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

Ankylos Plus (Dentsply) implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with seven (Sweden & Martina) implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

SPI Element sand-blasted acid-etched standard implants vs SPI Element SurfLink-modified implants

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

SPI Element sand-blasted acid-etched standard implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with SPI Element SurfLink-modified implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

ITI SLA titanium screws vs Southern blasted/etched titanium screws

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

ITI SLA titanium screws showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with southern blasted/etched titanium screws; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Astra TiO2-blasted titanium screws vs Branemark turned titanium screws

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

Astra TiO2-blasted titanium screws showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with branemark turned titanium screws; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

MegaGen EZ Plus blasted standard implants vs MegaGen EZ Plus calcium-incorporated (Xpeed) implants

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

MegaGen EZ Plus blasted standard implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with megaGen EZ Plus calcium-incorporated (Xpeed) implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Branemark Mark IV turned titanium implants vs Branemark Mark IV TiUnite oxidised implants

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

Branemark Mark IV turned titanium implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with branemark Mark IV TiUnite oxidised implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

NobelActive internal connection implants vs NobelReplace implants

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

NobelActive internal connection implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with nobelReplace implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

NobelReplace Select Tapered implants vs NobelReplace implants

Marginal bone level change · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

NobelReplace Select Tapered implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with nobelReplace Groovy implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review