Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

160 questions · 175 findings · 13 reviews

No studies found 45 · 25.7%GRADE not reported 9 · 5.1%Very low 40 · 22.9%Low 34 · 19.4%Moderate 38 · 21.7%High 9 · 5.1%

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Major bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes major bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Minor bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes minor bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Thrombocytopenia (up to 3 months)n · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) probably leads to higher thrombocytopenia (up to 3 months)n compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) probably leads to lower symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) compared with no LMWH (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic… compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Antibiotic versus heparin only lock/flush solution: catheter‐related infections · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) showed no clear difference in catheter‐related infection (up to 3 months) compared with no LMWH (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

Symptomatic VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin showed no clear difference in symptomatic VTE compared with with active control (1) (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

Major bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

Symptomatic PE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin showed no clear difference in symptomatic PE compared with with active control (1); GRADE not reported.

3 findings from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

Symptomatic DVT · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

Total VTE · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin showed no clear difference in any VTE compared with with active control (1); GRADE not reported.

3 findings from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

1‐year overall mortality · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs active control

Clinically relevant bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

Mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

Summary of findings: Heparin showed no clear difference in mortality attributable to hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs no treatment

Frequency of adverse events ( · People undergoing autologous or HLA identical allogeneic bone marrow transplant with a variety of malignant diseases or aplastic anaemia

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes frequency of adverse events ( compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Heparin vs prostaglandin E1

Incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( · Patients undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Heparin changes incidence of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease ( compared with prostaglandin E1 (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review