evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

136 questions · 138 findings · 9 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 31 · 22.5%GRADE not reported 43 · 31.2%Very low 19 · 13.8%Low 42 · 30.4%Moderate 3 · 2.2%High 0 · 0%

One-to-one advice on sugar restriction: detailed information on the sugar content of foods, with instruction to refrain from sugar-containing foods between meals and to reduce sugar in main meals (6-week sugar restriction) vs No advice on sugar restriction

Total sugar intake frequency (mean number of intakes per day) · Adults with frequent sugar intake harbouring Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in saliva (14 dental technical students and 6…
1 finding from 1 review

Sealing (resin sealant, glass ionomer cement, or polyurethane tape) vs Non-invasive / control treatment

Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression · Patients with non-cavitated proximal (approximal) caries lesions (primary or permanent dentition)

Sealing probably reduces the odds of proximal lesion progression compared with placebo (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.42; moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Low‐moderate GI diet vs moderate‐high GI diet (maternal outcomes)

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: severe hypertension or pre‐eclampsia · pregnant women with GDM

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Low‐moderate GI diet changes hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: severe hypertension or… compared with moderate‐high GI diet (maternal outcomes) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia · pregnant women with GDM

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia compared with no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

Caesarean section · pregnant women with GDM

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

Induction of labour · pregnant women with GDM

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Low‐moderate GI diet vs moderate‐high GI diet (maternal outcomes)

Eclampsia · pregnant women with GDM

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Low‐moderate GI diet changes hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: eclampsia compared with moderate‐high GI diet (maternal outcomes) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet vs no energy‐restricted diet (maternal outcomes)

Large‐for‐gestational age · pregnant women with GDM

Summary of findings: Energy‐restricted diet showed no clear difference in large‐for‐gestational age compared with no energy‐restricted diet (neonatal/child/adulthood outcomes) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review