Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

102 questions · 102 findings · 15 reviews · Pregnancy and Childbirth

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 9 · 8.8%GRADE not reported 8 · 7.8%Very low 23 · 22.5%Low 36 · 35.3%Moderate 22 · 21.6%High 4 · 3.9%

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Perinatal mortality · Pregnant women with/without complications

Computerised antenatal CTG probably leads to lower perinatal mortality compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.2 [0.04, 0.88]
2 studies · 469 participants
Moderate

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Caesarean section · Pregnant women with/without complications

Computerised antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.87 [0.61, 1.24]
1 study · 59 participants
Low