STRUCTURAL GROUP THERAPY (SGT) + TAU vs HANDICRAFT GROUP (HC) + TAU (all short‐term)
Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 48 participantsVery low
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
3,006 questions · 3,171 findings · 607 reviews · Headline outcomes only
No studies found 411 · 13%GRADE not reported 153 · 4.8%Very low 968 · 30.5%Low 897 · 28.3%Moderate 589 · 18.6%High 153 · 4.8%
COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU
Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsVery low
COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)
Global state: average score: long term (+ 26 weeks) Global Assessment Scale (GAS). Scale from: 0 to 100. · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 25 participantsVery low
COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)
Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 25 participantsVery low
COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CRP) + PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL TREATMENT PROGRAMME (PTP) vs PTP (all medium‐term)
Cognitive function · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 25 participantsVery low
COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)
Global state: Average endpoint score HoNOSCA (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 32 participantsVery low
COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)
Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 32 participantsVery low
COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)
Cognitive function: average endpoint score** · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 32 participantsVery low
COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)
Level of functioning · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 32 participantsVery low
PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL (PE) + MULTIFAMILY TREATMENT (MFT) vs NONSTRUCTURED GROUP THERAPY (NSGT, all long‐term)
Global state: Average endpoint score CGAS (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 49 participantsVery low
PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL (PE) + MULTIFAMILY TREATMENT (MFT) vs NONSTRUCTURED GROUP THERAPY (NSGT, all long‐term)
Mental State: Mean end point score PANSS ‐ (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 49 participantsVery low
COGNITIVE REMEDIATION THERAPY (CRG) + TREATMENT‐AS‐USUAL (TAU) vs TAU
Global functioning: Average endpoint VABS Score (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsVery low
GROUP PSYCHOSOCIAL THERAPY (GPT) + TAU vs TAU
Global state: Average endpoint score CGAS (high score = good) · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 56 participantsVery low
GROUP PSYCHOSOCIAL THERAPY (GPT) + TAU vs TAU
Mental state · Adolescents with psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 56 participantsVery low
CBT vs no treatment or treatment
Victim empathy: attitudes to women Measured by: Attitude Towards Women Scale (15 items; scores range from 0 to 45; higher scores indicate more egalitarian attitudes towards women) · young people (aged 10 to 18 years old) with harmful sexual behaviour
1 finding from 1 review
- Cognitive‐behavioural therapy (CBT) interventions for young people aged 10 to 18 with harmful sexual behaviour 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Interdisciplinary enhanced rehabilitation (inpatient and community rehabilitation) vs conventional rehabilitation
Functional ability: independence with activities of daily living at discharge from hospital · adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
- Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsVery low
Geriatrician‐led inpatient management vs orthopaedic‐led inpatient management
Functional outcomes · adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
- Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 87 participantsVery low
Geriatrician‐led inpatient management vs orthopaedic‐led inpatient management
Activities of daily living and functional performance (functional performance measured using the SPPB at 12 months) SPPB (0 to 12 points, where higher scores equate to greater functional performance) · adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery
2 findings from 1 review
- Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 87 participantsVery low
- Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 87 participantsVery low
Geriatrician‐led inpatient management vs orthopaedic‐led inpatient management
Cognitive function · adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
- Enhanced rehabilitation and care models for adults with dementia following hip fracture surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted1 study · 87 participantsVery low
Pharmacological agents vs placebo or any other pharmacological agent
Pain VAS. Scale from: 0 to 10; higher score = more pain · patients with Buerger's disease
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsVery low