Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1,085 questions · 1,232 findings · 66 reviews · All outcomes

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 218 · 17.7%GRADE not reported 745 · 60.5%Very low 179 · 14.5%Low 65 · 5.3%Moderate 25 · 2%High 0 · 0%

Ozone applied to the carious lesion (10 or 40 seconds), with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice vs No ozone, with a fluoride reductant and oral hygiene/preventive advice (as in the intervention group)

Time to intervention · People of any age with caries (including demineralisation in non-cavitated carious lesions); the caries may affect any single tooth…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ozone therapy for the treatment of dental caries 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
No data were provided in any of the included trials on time to intervention.
Studies not reported
No studies found

Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Biofeedback/stress management

Depressive symptoms · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity

Stabilisation splint (SS) led to higher depression (CES-D, POMS) compared with biofeedback/stress management; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
3 months or less
MD 5.50 [1.49, 9.51]
1 study
GRADE not reported

Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Non-occluding splint

Quality of life · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity

Stabilisation splint (SS) led to lower quality of life compared with non-occluding splint; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
3 months or less
RR 0.12 [0.02, 0.90]
1 study
GRADE not reported

Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Non-occluding splint

Overall improvement of symptoms · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity

Stabilisation splint (SS) showed no clear difference in overall improvement of symptoms compared with non-occluding splint; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
3 months or less
RR 1.13 [0.79, 1.61]
2 studies
GRADE not reported

Stabilisation splint (SS) vs Jaw exercises

Overall improvement · Patients with pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) of all degrees of severity

1 finding from 1 review

Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome 2004 · Cochrane All outcomes
up to 6 months
SS vs jaw exercises (Magnusson 1999): overall improvement at 3 months and greater than 3 months; no statistically significant between-group difference; a follow-up questionnaire 1 to 4 years later showed a lasting…
1 study
GRADE not reported