Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Population

Intervention or exposure

Comparison

Outcome

Any field or review title

Field or topic

Source

Review versions

2,653 questions in 194 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

current versions

No studies 531 · 20%Ungraded 76 · 2.9%Very low 826 · 31.1%Low 855 · 32.2%Moderate 341 · 12.9%High 24 · 0.9%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Question	Effect	Evidence	Status / GRADE
Cryopreservation vs intra‐venous albumin Moderate and or severe OHSS · patients with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2007) · Cochrane	OR 5.33 [0.51, 56.24]	1 study · 26 participants	Very low
Cryopreservation vs intra‐venous albumin Nil and or mild OHSS · patients with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2007) · Cochrane	OR 0.38 [0.08, 1.9]	1 study · 26 participants	Low
Cryopreservation vs intra‐venous albumin Clinical pregnancies · patients with risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Embryo freezing for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (2007) · Cochrane	OR 0.06 [0, 1.17]	1 study · 26 participants	Low