evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,782 questions · 1,852 findings · 128 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 557 · 30.1%GRADE not reported 53 · 2.9%Very low 446 · 24.1%Low 476 · 25.7%Moderate 255 · 13.8%High 65 · 3.5%

Patient‐reported health information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

It is very uncertain whether patient‐reported health information interventions changes patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐12 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions may leads to higher adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Desirable patient health outcomes (3‐12 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions showed no clear difference in desirable patient health outcomes (3‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Discharge to an increased level of care · Improving outcomes in older adult people admitted to a surgical service.

The intervention leads to lower discharge to an increased level of care (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

ICU follow‐up services vs standard care or no follow‐up service

All‐cause mortality Time point of measurement: 2 months in 1 randomised study; 12 months in 3 randomised studies; 14 months in 1 non‐randomised study · adult survivors of the ICU, excluding those already in an existing follow‐up or rehabilitation programme
1 finding from 1 review