Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,696 questions · 3,815 findings · 855 reviews

No studies found 573 · 15%GRADE not reported 374 · 9.8%Very low 993 · 26%Low 1,062 · 27.8%Moderate 614 · 16.1%High 199 · 5.2%

IVIg vs acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)

Incidence of any adverse effects after treatment initiation ( · people undergoing initial treatment for KD

It is very uncertain whether primary treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) changes incidence of any adverse effects after treatment initiation (from 30… compared with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

All‐cause mortality at up to day 281 · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality at up to day 281 compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Admission to hospital or death within 28 days · non‐hospitalised adults with mild COVID‐19

Remdesivir and standard care probably leads to lower clinical worsening: participants admitted to hospital or deceased at… compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

All‐cause mortality at up to day 60 · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality at up to day 60 compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

In‐hospital mortality at up to day 150 · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care showed no clear difference in in‐hospital mortality at up to day 150 compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Clinical improvement: discharged alive ( · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care probably leads to higher clinical improvement: participants alive and ready to be discharged… compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Clinical worsening: new need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care probably leads to lower clinical worsening: time to new need for invasive mechanical… compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Adverse events: all grades · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care showed no clear difference in adverse events (any grade) at up to day 28 compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Serious adverse events at up to day 28 · hospitalised individuals with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)

Remdesivir and standard care showed no clear difference in serious adverse events at up to day 28 compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Remdesivir and standard care vs placebo or usual care

Clinical improvement: participants with symptom alleviation at up to day 14 · non‐hospitalised adults with mild COVID‐19

It is very uncertain whether remdesivir and standard care changes clinical improvement: participants with symptom alleviation at up to… compared with standard care (plus/minus placebo) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review