Stage 2 pressure ulcer incidence · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether silicone dressing changes stage 2 pressure ulcer incidence compared with no dressing (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stage 4 pressure ulcer incidence · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether silicone dressing changes stage 4 pressure ulcer incidence compared with no dressing (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Unstageable pressure ulcer incidence · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether silicone dressing changes unstageable pressure ulcer incidence compared with no dressing (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Deep tissue injury pressure ulcer incidence · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether silicone dressing changes deep tissue injury pressure ulcer incidence compared with no dressing (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
Fatty acid may leads to lower pressure ulcer incidence: fatty acid vs control compound compared with other topical intervention or standard care (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether other dressing changes pressure ulcer incidence: polyurethane film vs hydrocolloid dressing compared with control (very low certainty).
4 findings from 1 review
RR 0.58 [0.24, 1.41]
1 study · 160 participants
Very low
RR 0.42 [0.08, 2.05]
1 study · 100 participants
Very low
RR 1.31 [0.83, 2.07]
1 study · 74 participants
Low
Show 1 more finding
Incidence of pressure ulcers · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether other dressing changes pressure ulcer incidence: PPD vs no dressing compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse event: fatty acid vs olive oil · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
Fatty acid showed no clear difference in adverse event: fatty acid vs olive oil compared with other topical intervention or standard care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether active topical agent changes pressure ulcer incidence: active lotion vs placebo compared with placebo/control (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Incidence of pressure ulcers · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether active topical agent changes pressure ulcer incidence: Conotrane vs placebo compared with placebo/control (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Mean GI symptom scores (lower is better) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
Summary of findings: Counselling showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (lower is better) compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
Summary of findings: Counselling may leads to lower diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Counselling changes QOL scores (5‐point VAS; lower is better) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mean GI symptom scores (lower is better) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Protein supplements changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found