Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,036 questions · 1,100 findings · 261 reviews

No studies found 160 · 14.5%GRADE not reported 188 · 17.1%Very low 270 · 24.5%Low 303 · 27.5%Moderate 139 · 12.6%High 40 · 3.6%

Systematic screening vs no/opportunistic screening

All‐cause mortality · general population including those at moderate to high risk of CVD, mean age between 30 and 75

Systematic screening showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with no/opportunistic screening (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Systematic screening vs no/opportunistic screening

Total coronary heart disease · general population including those at moderate to high risk of CVD, mean age between 30 and 75

Systematic screening showed no clear difference in coronary heart disease (total) compared with no/opportunistic screening (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine fetal movement counting vs mixed or undefined fetal movement counting

Maternal‐fetal attachment · Pregnant women who had reached the gestational age of fetal viability

Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in maternal‐fetal attachment compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine fetal movement counting vs mixed or undefined fetal movement counting

Number of antenatal hospital admissions · Pregnant women who had reached the gestational age of fetal viability

Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in antenatal hospital admission rate per cluster (mean) compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine fetal movement counting vs mixed or undefined fetal movement counting

Low birthweight (< 2500 g or < 10th centile) · Pregnant women who had reached the gestational age of fetal viability

Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in low birthweight (< 2500 g or < 10th centile) compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · Pregnant women with/without complications

It is very uncertain whether computerised antenatal CTG changes apgar less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review