evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,296 questions · 1,330 findings · 157 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 297 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 88 · 6.6%Very low 327 · 24.6%Low 317 · 23.8%Moderate 239 · 18%High 62 · 4.7%

Antibiotics vs control

Antibiotic resistance · people (any age) with active trachoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review
  • Antibiotics for trachoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    no estimate extracted
    Studies not reported
    No studies found

Antibiotics vs control

Adverse effects · people (any age) with active trachoma

Antibiotic may leads to lower adverse effects compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral vs topical antibiotics

Active trachoma · people (any age) with active trachoma

Oral showed no clear difference in active trachoma Clinical assessment: active trachoma defined as TF,… compared with topical antibiotic (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral vs topical antibiotics

Antibiotic resistance · people (any age) with active trachoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review
  • Antibiotics for trachoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    no estimate extracted
    Studies not reported
    No studies found

Oral azithromycin vs control

Active trachoma · people (any age) with active trachoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review
  • Antibiotics for trachoma 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    no estimate extracted
    Studies not reported
    No studies found

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

All‐cause mortality · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage changes mortality compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage vs gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage

Intra‐abdominal infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether gram‐positive and gram‐negative coverage changes intra‐abdominal infection compared with gram‐negative and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anaerobic coverage only vs gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage

Abdominal surgical site infection · people undergoing laparotomy for penetrating abdominal trauma

It is very uncertain whether anaerobic coverage only changes abdominal surgical site infection compared with gram‐positive, gram‐negative, and anaerobic coverage (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review