Quality of life · people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mobility · people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 8 participants
Very low
Phantom limb pain frequency · people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Prosthesis use · people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events – pain · people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
Mortality ‐ all cause · people with transtibial amputation due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
All‐cause mortality
The intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cardiovascular‐related mortality
The intervention showed no clear difference in cardiovascular‐related mortality (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
All‐cause hospital admission (number of events) ‐ not reported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
All‐cause hospital admission (number of participants with at least one event)
The intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause hospital admission (number of participants with at least… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cardiovascular‐related hospital admission (number of events)
The intervention may leads to lower cardiovascular‐related hospital admission (number of events) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cardiovascular‐related hospital admission (number of participants with at least one event)
The intervention showed no clear difference in cardiovascular‐related hospital admission (number of participants… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Health‐related quality of life
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Health‐related quality of life
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events ‐ not reported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Adherence · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Adverse effects Number of outstanding complaints · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes adverse effects Number of outstanding complaints (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Quality of life · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Self‐reported hearing handicap Validated self‐report measure HHIE scale from: 0 to 100 (Ventry 1982) · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Hearing aid benefit Validated self‐report measure. Outer EAR scale from: 0 to 100 · adults with hearing loss who use hearing aids
1 finding from 1 review