What do systematic reviews say?

foam dressing vs hydrocolloid dressing

It is very uncertain whether foam dressings changes number of ulcers healed compared with hydrocolloid matrix dressings (very low certainty).

• Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.88 [0.61, 1.26]
  1 study · 40 participants
  Very low

foam dressing vs hydrocolloid dressing

• Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 1 participants
  GRADE not reported

foam dressing vs hydrocolloid dressing

• Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported
• Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1 [0.81, 1.22]
  5 studies · 418 participants
  Moderate

foam dressing vs hydrocolloid dressing

• Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

foam dressing vs hydrocolloid dressing

foam dressing showed no clear difference in proportion of participants experiencing adverse events compared with hydrocolloid dressing (low certainty).

• Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.22 [0.64, 2.31]
  1 study · 107 participants
  Low

foam dressing vs hydrocolloid dressing

• Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Starches vs crystalloid

Starches showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (at end of compared with crystalloid (moderate certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.97 [0.86, 1.09]
  24 studies · 11177 participants
  Moderate

Dextrans vs crystalloid

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Dextrans vs crystalloid

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gelatins vs crystalloid

Gelatins showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (at end of compared with crystalloid (low certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.89 [0.74, 1.08]
  6 studies · 1698 participants
  Low

Gelatins vs crystalloid

Gelatins showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (within 90 days) compared with crystalloid (low certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.89 [0.73, 1.09]
  1 study · 1388 participants
  Low

Gelatins vs crystalloid

Gelatins showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (within 30 days) compared with crystalloid (low certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.92 [0.74, 1.16]
  1 study · 1388 participants
  Low

Gelatins vs crystalloid

It is very uncertain whether gelatins changes transfusion of blood products compared with crystalloid (very low certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 5.89 [0.24, 142.41]
  1 study · 167 participants
  Very low

Gelatins vs crystalloid

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Gelatins vs crystalloid

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  Very low

Albumin and fresh frozen plasma vs crystalloid

Albumin and fresh frozen plasma showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (at end of compared with crystalloid (moderate certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.98 [0.92, 1.06]
  20 studies · 13047 participants
  Moderate

Albumin and fresh frozen plasma vs crystalloid

Albumin and fresh frozen plasma showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (within 90 days) compared with crystalloid (moderate certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.98 [0.92, 1.04]
  10 studies · 12492 participants
  Moderate

Starches vs crystalloid

Starches showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (at 90 days) compared with crystalloid (moderate certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.01 [0.9, 1.14]
  15 studies · 10415 participants
  Moderate

Albumin and fresh frozen plasma vs crystalloid

Albumin and fresh frozen plasma showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (within 30 days) compared with crystalloid (moderate certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.99 [0.93, 1.06]
  10 studies · 12506 participants
  Moderate

Albumin and fresh frozen plasma vs crystalloid

It is very uncertain whether albumin and fresh frozen plasma changes transfusion of blood products compared with crystalloid (very low certainty).

• Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.31 [0.95, 1.8]
  3 studies · 290 participants
  Very low