Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

122 questions · 122 findings · 10 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 44 · 36.1%GRADE not reported 4 · 3.3%Very low 42 · 34.4%Low 22 · 18%Moderate 9 · 7.4%High 1 · 0.8%

Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment;

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback showed no clear difference in number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment; (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy

Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback probably leads to lower number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus biofeedback vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction

Number of participants experiencing surface or skin‐related adverse events: e.g. skin reactions, bruising, hypersensitivity to gel · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
1 finding from 1 review

Prevention of UI after TURP: pre or post‐operative PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment

Number of incontinent men ‐ within 3 to 6 months · All men after TURP

It is very uncertain whether prevention of UI after TURP: pre or post‐operative PFMT ± biofeedback changes number of incontinent men ‐ within 3 to 6 months compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review