Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

195 questions · 198 findings · 17 reviews

No studies found 65 · 32.8%GRADE not reported 8 · 4%Very low 57 · 28.8%Low 40 · 20.2%Moderate 27 · 13.6%High 1 · 0.5%

Intervention not reported

Uncemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

The intervention may leads to higher uncemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence,… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (6 RCTs; 771 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes cemented modern bipolar hemiarthroplasty (6 RCTs; 771 participants)a (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncemented first‐generation unipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 RCTs; 668 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

The intervention showed no clear difference in uncemented first‐generation unipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 RCTs; 668… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncemented modern unipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 RCTs; 891 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncemented modern unipolar hemiarthroplasty (4 RCTs; 891… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Total hip arthroplasty (single articulation) (2 RCTs; 225 participants)a · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes total hip arthroplasty (single articulation) (2 RCTs; 225… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Dual‐mobility total hip arthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with intracapsular hip fractures; most fractures in the included studies were displaced

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes dual‐mobility total hip arthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) · older adults (> 60 years of age) with extracapsular hip fractures

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes hemiarthroplasty (No direct evidence, indirect evidence only) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Performance based measures ‐ Range of motion (possible range 0 (worst) to 140 (maximal) degrees) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Survival rate of the implant (Revision surgery reported) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Health related quality of life measures and functional measures with validated instruments (WOMAC, range 0‐100, higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Global assessment (patient) Patient satisfaction on scale 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Complications · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Re‐operation rate (not involving implant change, short and long term) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain) points) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Survival rate of the implant (Revision surgery reported) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Health related quality of life measures and functional measures with validated instruments (WOMAC, range 0‐100, higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Global assessment (patient) Patient satisfaction on scale 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review