Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · preventing pressure ulcers
It is very uncertain whether reactive fibre surfaces changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with foam surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to pressure ulcer development · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Support surface associated patient comfort · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
All reported adverse events · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Health‐related quality of life · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cost‐effectiveness · preventing pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces showed no clear difference in proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with foam surfaces (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to pressure ulcer development · pressure ulcer prevention
It is very uncertain whether alternating pressure (active) air surfaces changes time to pressure ulcer development compared with foam surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Support surface associated patient comfort · pressure ulcer prevention
1 finding from 1 review
All reported adverse events · pressure ulcer prevention
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · pressure ulcer prevention
2 findings from 1 review
Cost‐effectiveness · pressure ulcer prevention
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Moderate
Stage 3 pressure ulcer incidence: Conotrane vs placebo · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether active topical agent changes stage 3 pressure ulcer incidence: Conotrane vs placebo compared with placebo/control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Stage 4 pressure ulcer incidence: Conotrane vs placebo · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether active topical agent changes stage 4 pressure ulcer incidence: Conotrane vs placebo compared with placebo/control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of pressure ulcers · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development
It is very uncertain whether active topical agent changes pressure ulcer incidence: Conotrane vs placebo compared with placebo/control (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
All reported adverse events · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life · people with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cost‐effectiveness · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
Ulcer healing · people with pressure ulcers
Reactive air surfaces showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with pressure ulcers completely healed compared with foam surfaces (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to complete healing of pressure ulcers ‐ not reported · people with pressure ulcers
Reactive air surfaces may leads to higher time to complete pressure ulcer healing compared with foam surfaces (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review