Time to progression of the tumour · people with advanced biliary tract carcinomas
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Grade 1 ‐ 4 thrombocytopenia · people with advanced biliary tract carcinomas
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus mitomycin C changes grade 1 ‐ 4 thrombocytopenia compared with capecitabine plus mitomycin C (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to progression of the tumour · people with advanced biliary tract carcinomas
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Grade 1 ‐ 4 anaemia · people with advanced biliary tract carcinomas
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus vandetanib changes grade 1 ‐ 4 anaemia compared with vandetanib (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality at 1 year · people with advanced biliary tract carcinomas
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Serious adverse events · people with advanced biliary tract carcinomas
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine changes serious adverse events compared with vandetanib (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Helath‐related quality of life · people with advanced biliary tract carcinomas
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Overall survival · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma
Summary of findings table (subcomparison 4): targeted therapy agent… leads to lower overall survival compared with control intervention alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Progression‐free survival · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma
Summary of findings table (subcomparison 4): targeted therapy agent… probably leads to lower progression‐free survival compared with control intervention alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Toxicity · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (subcomparison 4): targeted therapy agent… changes toxicity compared with control intervention alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma
1 finding from 1 review
Studies with gastric cancer participants in addition to eligible participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… showed no clear difference in studies with gastric cancer participants in addition to eligible… compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, first part · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… changes sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, first part compared with gastric carcinoma (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Sensitivity analysis, only esophageal and GE‐junction cancer participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… led to lower sensitivity analysis, only esophageal and GE‐junction cancer… compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Sensitivity analysis, only gastric cancer participants · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… showed no clear difference in sensitivity analysis, only gastric cancer participants compared with gastric carcinoma; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, second part · palliative participants with esophageal and GE‐junction carcinoma or gastric carcinoma
Summary of findings table (sensitivity analysis): interventions… probably leads to lower sensitivity analysis, meta‐regression analysis, second part compared with gastric carcinoma (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival · people with advanced gastric cancer
5‐FU/cisplatin/anthracycline combinations may leads to lower overall survival compared with 5‐FU/anthracycline combinations (without cisplatin) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival · people with advanced gastric cancer
Irinotecan probably leads to lower overall survival compared with non‐irinotecan‐containing regimens (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival ‐ Substitutive comparisons · people with advanced gastric cancer
Irinotecan showed no clear difference in overall survival ‐ Substitutive comparisons compared with non‐irinotecan‐containing regimens (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival ‐ Additive comparisons · people with advanced gastric cancer
Irinotecan showed no clear difference in overall survival ‐ Additive comparisons compared with non‐irinotecan‐containing regimens (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review