evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

864 questions · 884 findings · 229 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 136 · 15.4%GRADE not reported 37 · 4.2%Very low 242 · 27.4%Low 298 · 33.7%Moderate 131 · 14.8%High 40 · 4.5%

Routine fetal movement counting vs mixed or undefined fetal movement counting

Maternal‐fetal attachment · Pregnant women who had reached the gestational age of fetal viability

Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in maternal‐fetal attachment compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine fetal movement counting vs mixed or undefined fetal movement counting

Number of antenatal hospital admissions · Pregnant women who had reached the gestational age of fetal viability

Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in antenatal hospital admission rate per cluster (mean) compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine fetal movement counting vs mixed or undefined fetal movement counting

Low birthweight (< 2500 g or < 10th centile) · Pregnant women who had reached the gestational age of fetal viability

Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in low birthweight (< 2500 g or < 10th centile) compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · Pregnant women with/without complications

It is very uncertain whether computerised antenatal CTG changes apgar less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional antenatal CTG vs no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication)

Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · Pregnant women with/without complications

It is very uncertain whether traditional antenatal CTG changes apgar less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional antenatal CTG vs no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication)

Admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit · Pregnant women with/without complications

Traditional antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Perinatal mortality · Pregnant women with/without complications

Computerised antenatal CTG probably leads to lower perinatal mortality compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review