Number of women reporting adverse events ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Disease‐specific quality of life ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Objective measure of urine leakage (e.g. pad test) ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of women experiencing pain ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of women cured · women with urinary incontinence
It is very uncertain whether PFMT added to electrical stimulation changes number of women cured compared with electrical stimulation alone (excluding implanted electrodes) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Objective measure of urine leakage (e.g. pad test) ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of women experiencing pain ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Disease‐specific quality of life · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Participants cured or improved · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Objective measure of urine leakage (pad test) · women with urinary incontinence
It is very uncertain whether PFMT added to vaginal cones changes objective measure of urine leakage (pad test) compared with vaginal cones alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Objective measure of urine leakage (e.g. pad test) ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of women reporting adverse events ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Disease‐specific quality of life · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of women whose incontinence was improved or cured ‐ · women with urinary incontinence
PFMT added to continence pessary showed no clear difference in number of women cured or improved (subjective) at 12 months compared with continence pessary alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Objective measure of urine leakage (e.g. pad test) ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of women reporting adverse events ‐ not reported · women with urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found