What do systematic reviews say?

Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers

Oral hygiene care training of carers showed no clear difference in plaque (medium term) compared with no training (or a placebo training session) of carers (low certainty).

• Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes

  Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
  MD -0.07 [-0.26, 0.13]
  2 studies · 99 participants
  Low

Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers

It is very uncertain whether oral hygiene care training of carers changes behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy of carers (medium term) compared with no training (or a placebo training session) of carers (very low certainty).

• Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes

  Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
  MD 0.15 [-0.80, 1.10]
  2 studies · 189 participants
  Very low

Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers

Oral hygiene care training of carers may leads to higher oral health knowledge of carers (medium term) compared with no training (or a placebo training session) of carers (low certainty).

• Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes

  Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
  MD 0.69 [0.31, 1.06]
  2 studies · 189 participants
  Low

Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers

Oral hygiene care training of carers showed no clear difference in gingival inflammation (medium term) compared with no training (or a placebo training session) of carers (low certainty).

• Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities 2019 · Cochrane All outcomes

  Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
  MD -0.09 [-0.63, 0.45]
  2 studies · 99 participants
  Low

Conventional training plus additions vs conventional training

It is very uncertain whether conventional training plus additions changes observed appropriate RPE use compared with conventional training (very low certainty).

• Behavioural interventions to promote workers' use of respiratory protective equipment 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.41 [0.96, 2.07]
  1 study · 64 participants
  Very low

Conventional training plus additions vs conventional training

• Behavioural interventions to promote workers' use of respiratory protective equipment 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 50 participants
  Very low

Conventional training plus additions vs conventional training

• Behavioural interventions to promote workers' use of respiratory protective equipment 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 50 participants
  Very low

Mixed training vs usual care

• Exercise interventions for cerebral palsy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 163 participants
  Low

Physical exercise training vs usual care

• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 68 participants
  Low

Physical exercise training vs usual care

• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 22 participants
  Very low
• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Physical exercise training vs usual care

• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 68 participants
  Very low

Physical exercise training vs usual care

• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 40 participants
  Low

Physical exercise training vs usual care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Physical exercise training vs usual care

• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 51 participants
  Moderate

Physical exercise training vs usual care

• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 64 participants
  Low

Physical exercise training vs usual care

• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 28 participants
  Low

Physical exercise training vs usual care

• Physical exercise training interventions for children and young adults during and after treatment for childhood cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 28 participants
  Low

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 3 participants
  Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found