What do systematic reviews say?

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 103 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 188 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  8 studies · 506 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention

• Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 81 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Restitutive interventions changes visual field (TAP border position in degrees of visual angle from… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 1.02
  1 study · 19 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Restitutive interventions changes quality of life (improved or not improved ‐ derived from percentage… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 13 [2.07, 81.48]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Compensative interventions changes extended activities of daily living (Mobility questionnaire and… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.49
  2 studies · 97 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions showed no clear difference in reading ability (Reading speed; various tests) After intervention compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.26
  4 studies · 162 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions may leads to higher quality of life (National Eye Institute Visual Function… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  MD 9.36 [3.1, 15.62]
  2 studies · 96 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions showed no clear difference in scanning ‐ cancellation (cancellation tests ‐ time to complete)… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 97 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions may leads to higher adverse events (number of participants with reported events during… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 5.18
  2 studies · 108 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes functional ability in activities of daily living (Barthel Index)… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 39 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes visual field (change in visual field area & change in error scores,… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.12 [0.44, 1.8]
  2 studies · 85 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes extended activities of daily living (Change in EADL from baseline;… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  SMD 0.2
  2 studies · 99 participants
  Very low