Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

78 questions · 94 findings · 5 reviews · Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders

No studies found 35 · 37.2%GRADE not reported 2 · 2.1%Very low 39 · 41.5%Low 16 · 17%Moderate 2 · 2.1%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings: pioglitazone monotherapy vs another pharmacological glucose‐lowering monotherapy

Metformin · people at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes
2 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings: pioglitazone monotherapy vs another pharmacological glucose‐lowering monotherapy

Metformin Diagnostic criteria: 2 studies applied the WHO 1999 criteria for 'prediabetes' (FPG > 6.1 mmol/L and < 7.0 mmol/L and/or a 2‐h glucose < 11.1 mmol/L after a 75 g OGTT; Chen 2007a; Zeng 2013) · people at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes

Summary of findings: pioglitazone monotherapy showed no clear difference in metformin Diagnostic criteria: 2 studies applied the WHO 1999… compared with another pharmacological glucose‐lowering monotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Non‐fatal macrovascular outcomes 1. Composite a. Intervention vs metformin [1a. 6 months to 4 years] b. Intervention vs thiazolidinediones [1b. 52 weeks to 4 years] c. Intervention vs meglitinide [1c. 12 months to 15 months]2. Non‐fatal myocardial... · participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The intervention may leads to lower non‐fatal macrovascular outcomes 1. Composite a. Intervention vs… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events 1. All adverse events 2. Drop‐outs due to adverse events 3. Severe hypoglycaemia a. Intervention vs placebo [1a. 24 weeks] [2a. 24 weeks to 56 weeks] b. Intervention vs metformin [1b. 6 months to 4 years] [2b. 24 weeks to 4 years] [... · participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse events 1. All adverse events 2. Drop‐outs due to adverse… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

All‐cause mortality a. Intervention vs metformin [a. 24 weeks to 4 years] b. Intervention vs thiazolidinediones [b. 24 weeks to 4 years] c. Intervention vs insulin [c. 9 months to 10 years] d. Intervention vs incretin‐based control [d. 52 weeks to... · participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The intervention showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality a. Intervention vs metformin [a. 24 weeks to 4… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Cardiovascular mortality a. Intervention vs metformin [a. 24 weeks to 4 years] b. Intervention vs thiazolidinediones [b. 24 weeks to 4 years] c. Intervention vs insulin [c. 9 months to 10 years] d. Intervention vs meglitinide [d. 12 months to 17 m... · participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus

The intervention showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality a. Intervention vs metformin [a. 24 weeks… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review