Intervention not reported
Finding 15. Healthcare providers differed in their views about whether telerehabilitation was cost‐efficient for them, but many patients encountered it as affordable and cost‐saving when the equipment and infrastructure have been provided.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Finding 5. Patients and healthcare providers described several factors that might affect patients’ motivation and engagement with telerehabilitation services, including support from healthcare providers or family members and other caregivers durin...
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Finding 10. Patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders described how telerehabilitation changed the nature of the patient‐provider relationship. This included overcoming physical barriers to communication and enabling quick ...
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Finding 12. Patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders regarded telerehabilitation as an opportunity to make rehabilitation services more accessible.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Unplanned admission to hospital · people referred for end‐of‐life care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Participant health outcomes, including control of symptoms · people referred for end‐of‐life care
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes participant health outcomes, including control of symptoms (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Patient satisfaction · people referred for end‐of‐life care
The intervention may leads to lower patient satisfaction (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Caregiver outcomes · people referred for end‐of‐life care
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes caregiver outcomes (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Staff views on the provision of services · people referred for end‐of‐life care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Health service resource use and cost · people referred for end‐of‐life care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mortality (3 ‐ 6 month · patients recovering from a stroke who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
The intervention showed no clear difference in mortality (3 ‐ 6 month (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Patient satisfaction · older patients with a mix of conditions who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Hospital length of stay · older patients with a mix of conditions who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cost · older patients with a mix of conditions who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mortality · patients recovering from surgery who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Hospital readmission · patients recovering from surgery who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Living in an institutional setting · patients recovering from surgery who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Patient satisfaction · patients recovering from surgery who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Hospital length of stay (patients recovering from orthopaedic surgery) · patients recovering from surgery who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
The intervention showed no clear difference in hospital length of stay (patients recovering from orthopaedic surgery) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Cost · patients recovering from surgery who otherwise would require acute hospital inpatient care
1 finding from 1 review