Quality of life: number of participants with clinically significant improvement (≥ 4 units) in SGRQ total score · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fixed‐dose combination aclidinium/formoterol showed no clear difference in quality of life: number of participants with clinically significant… compared with aclidinium alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Lung function · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (not including serious adverse events): number of participants · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fixed‐dose combination aclidinium/formoterol showed no clear difference in adverse events (not including serious adverse events): number of… compared with placebo (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Non‐fatal serious adverse events · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fixed‐dose combination aclidinium/formoterol showed no clear difference in non‐fatal serious adverse events compared with aclidinium alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Hospital admissions due to exacerbations: number of participants · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fixed‐dose combination aclidinium/formoterol showed no clear difference in hospital admissions due to exacerbations: number of participants compared with aclidinium alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Improvement in symptoms: number of participants with clinically significant improvement: using TDI focal score (≥ 1 unit) · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fixed‐dose combination aclidinium/formoterol leads to higher improvement in symptoms: number of participants with clinically… compared with aclidinium alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Lung function · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (not including serious adverse events): number of participants · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Fixed‐dose combination aclidinium/formoterol showed no clear difference in adverse events (not including serious adverse events): number of… compared with aclidinium alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events－serious events Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus budesonide (BD) · patients with COPD
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes adverse events－serious events Budesonide/formoterol (BDF) versus… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events－serious Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus Mometasone (MF) · patients with COPD
The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse events－serious Mometasone/formoterol (MF/F) versus… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants experiencing one or more episode requiring treatment with oral steroids · adults and children with chronic asthma
Combination fluticasone/salmeterol showed no clear difference in participants experiencing exacerbations requiring oral steroid… compared with budesonide/formoterol (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Hospital admissions due to exacerbations: number of participants · adults and children with chronic asthma
Combination fluticasone/salmeterol showed no clear difference in participants experiencing exacerbations requiring admission to… compared with budesonide/formoterol (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Asthma‐related serious adverse event · adults and children with chronic asthma
Combination fluticasone/salmeterol showed no clear difference in asthma‐related serious adverse event compared with budesonide/formoterol (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality · adults and children with chronic asthma
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events · adults and children with chronic asthma
Combination fluticasone/salmeterol showed no clear difference in withdrawals (adverse events) compared with budesonide/formoterol (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Hospital admissions due to exacerbations: number of participants · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS
160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy showed no clear difference in patients with exacerbations causing hospitalisation compared with current best practice (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Withdrawals due to adverse events · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS
Single inhaler therapy leads to lower discontinuation due to adverse events compared with fixed dose ICS (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Rate of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS
160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy probably leads to lower patients with exacerbations treated with oral steroids compared with current best practice (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Fatal serious adverse events · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS
160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy showed no clear difference in fatal serious adverse events compared with current best practice (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Non‐fatal serious adverse events · adults with asthma not well controlled on ICS
160/4.5 mcg BDF single inhaler therapy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (non‐fatal) compared with current best practice (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review