Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

115 questions · 115 findings · 11 reviews

No studies found 27 · 23.5%GRADE not reported 2 · 1.7%Very low 34 · 29.6%Low 33 · 28.7%Moderate 16 · 13.9%High 3 · 2.6%

COMPARISON 1. ARIPIPRAZOLE vs QUETIAPINE

Global state: No clinically significant response (as defined by the original studies) · patients with schizophrenia

COMPARISON 2. ARIPIPRAZOLE showed no clear difference in global state: No clinically significant response (as defined by… compared with QUETIAPINE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

CLOZAPINE + ARIPIPRAZOLE vs CLOZAPINE + HALOPERIDOL (Cipriani 2013)

Acceptability of treatment ‐ leaving the study early · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether CLOZAPINE + ARIPIPRAZOLE changes leaving the study early: acceptability of treatment ‐ as measured by… compared with CLOZAPINE + HALOPERIDOL (Cipriani 2013) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

CLOZAPINE + ARIPIPRAZOLE vs CLOZAPINE + HALOPERIDOL (Cipriani 2013)

Quality of life/satisfaction with care for either recipients of care or carers: significant change in quality of life/satisfaction · people with treatment‐resistant schizophrenia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

SWITCHING ‐ NEW ANTIPSYCHOTIC REGIMEN vs CONTINUATION ON PREVIOUS REGIMEN: 1b. NEW ATYPICAL from OLANZAPINE ‐ medium term (3‐12 months)

Physiological measures: 1c. Average fasting glucose change ‐ switching to aripiprazole and quetiapine · patients with people with schizophrenia who have neuroleptic‐induced weight or metabolic problems
1 finding from 1 review

SWITCHING ‐ NEW ANTIPSYCHOTIC REGIMEN vs CONTINUATION ON PREVIOUS REGIMEN: 1b. NEW ATYPICAL from OLANZAPINE ‐ medium term (3‐12 months)

Adverse events: 1a. Serious adverse event ‐ switching to aripiprazole · patients with people with schizophrenia who have neuroleptic‐induced weight or metabolic problems

SWITCHING ‐ NEW ANTIPSYCHOTIC REGIMEN showed no clear difference in adverse events: 1a. Serious adverse event ‐ switching to aripiprazole compared with CONTINUATION ON PREVIOUS REGIMEN: 1b. NEW ATYPICAL from OLANZAPINE ‐… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lithium vs ARIPIPRAZOLE

Efficacy: response (categorical) BMRS change ≥ 50% from baseline to end of study · acute mania

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review
  • Lithium for acute mania 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    no estimate extracted
    Studies not reported
    No studies found

Lithium vs ARIPIPRAZOLE

Efficacy: response (continuous) YMRS change by ≥ 50% at end of study · acute mania

Lithium showed no clear difference in efficacy: response (continuous) YMRS change by ≥ 50% at end of study compared with aripiprazole (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Lithium for acute mania 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    OR 0.96 [0.62, 1.51]
    1 study · 309 participants
    Moderate

Lithium vs ARIPIPRAZOLE

Remission · acute mania

Lithium showed no clear difference in efficacy: remission (categorical) YMRS ≤ 12 at end of study compared with aripiprazole (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review
  • Lithium for acute mania 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
    OR 0.99 [0.63, 1.56]
    1 study · 309 participants
    Moderate