Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

748 questions · 782 findings · 58 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

No studies found 164 · 21%GRADE not reported 26 · 3.3%Very low 151 · 19.3%Low 222 · 28.4%Moderate 158 · 20.2%High 61 · 7.8%

Summary of findings: IMRT vs 3DCRT

Mean GI symptom scores (EORTC‐QLQPR25 scale; lower scores better) · People with urological (prostate) and gynaecological (cervical) cancer

Summary of findings: IMRT showed no clear difference in mean GI symptom scores (EORTC‐QLQPR25 scale; lower scores better) compared with 3DCRT (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Amifostine vs no intervention

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People with urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Amifostine changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) during treatment compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Sodium butyrate vs placebo

Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer

Summary of findings: Sodium butyrate showed no clear difference in acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Bile acid sequestrants vs no intervention

Mean GI symptom scores (during RT) · People with pelvic cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Bile acid sequestrants changes mean GI symptom scores (during RT) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Bile acid sequestrants vs no intervention

Acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) · People with pelvic cancer

Summary of findings: Bile acid sequestrants may leads to higher acute and late GI toxicity (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review