Intervention not reported
23% reduction in number of injury crashes. 66% reduction in fatal crashes.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Aggregate change in crashes was a significant 12% reduction for experimental roads.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
High
Intervention not reported
A reduction of 35% in the total number of crashes for phase 1 and 2 compared to the control roads and the same period 3 years previously.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Phase 3 ‐ conducted in 1994 on one road in one province Noord‐Brabant. The reduction in crashes found in 1991 had been maintained.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
A significant 20% reduction in injury crashes equating to about 62 injury crashes per year on all 64 road sections combined.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
High
Intervention not reported
Reduction of 9.17% in crashes and a significant 32.4% in serious injury compared to New Zealand overall.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Total crash reduction at enforcement zones of 44 to 55%, injury crash reduction of 46 to 56% with no reduction seen in rear‐end crashes
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
High
Intervention not reported
About 25% reduction in crashes to that expected. A significant 11% reduction in number of victims, with an average decrease of 139 daytime traffic crashes requiring an ambulance. A 17% reduction in daytime crash fatalities.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Outcome measures were numbers of road crashes, numbers of people injured (combined fatal and non‐fatal) and number of vehicles involved in crashes. The relative risk of a road crash after implementation was 0.73 (5% CI = 0.63, 0.85) This effect wa...
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
High
Intervention not reported
A 45.74% reduction in weighted injury crashes within 250 metres from camera sites (total monthly before count of 23.4 compared to total monthly after count of 12.7) with lesser but still significant decreases observed in the wider surrounding area...
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Crash outcomes measured: Killed and seriously injured (KSIs) and personal injury crashes (PICs). Across all sites KSI's decreased by 42%. This equated to about 1700 fewer KSI's per annum at these camera sites. Fixed cameras in both urban (47% redu...
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Having controlled for season and general trends, injury crash outcomes in experimental areas relative to control areas were a net reduction of 11% (p= 0.03) in all crashes and 19% (p=0.002) in injury crashes on open roads across the region associa...
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Prosthesis failure · Patients with compromised teeth to be extracted who require single dental implants in fresh postextraction sockets
Immediate-delayed implants (placed within 8 weeks after tooth… led to lower prosthesis failure compared with delayed implants (placed at least 2 months after extraction); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Measures of behaviour / negative responses during local anaesthesia administration · Children aged 10 to 16 years undergoing orthodontic extractions (Braithwaite 2005)
1 finding from 1 review
Hypnosis can control some of the patient's negative responses to dental treatment, such as movement and behaviour, during administration of local anaesthesia. (Braithwaite 2005; single-blind cross-over, 10 patients…
1 study · 10 participants
GRADE not reported
Augmentation (prosthesis/implant) failure · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites)
Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone) led to lower augmentation (prosthesis/implant) failure compared with bio-Oss + resorbable barrier; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Implant/prosthesis failure and complications · Patients with resorbed maxillae (incl. atrophic sinuses) needing implants
1 finding from 1 review
Prosthesis failure · People with dental implants
1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with 2-stage (submerged) implant placement (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Prosthesis/implant failure (1 year) · Patients with horizontally resorbed maxillary sites needing single implants
Autogenous bone block from the chin + resorbable barrier showed no clear difference in prosthesis/implant failure (1 year) compared with 100% Bio-Oss + resorbable barrier; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Prosthesis failure · Patients with atrophic posterior mandibles (5 to 7 mm above the mandibular canal) needing implants
Inlay autogenous bone graft (iliac crest) showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with inlay bone substitute (Bio-Oss block); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Prosthesis/implant failure (1 year) · Patients with horizontally resorbed maxillary sites needing single implants
Autogenous bone block from the chin showed no clear difference in prosthesis/implant failure (1 year) compared with 100% Bio-Oss + resorbable barrier; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review