Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4: marginal discoloration
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.00 [1.25, 3.20]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7: non-stable (mobile) restoration
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 8.50 [6.23, 11.61]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7: non-stable (mobile) restoration
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 7:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 14.98 [4.84, 46.32]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1: partial loss or fracture of the restoration
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.79 [0.70, 0.88]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4: marginal discoloration
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 7.37 [3.51, 15.46]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.54 [1.69, 3.81]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 8: disruption of occlusal integrity · Dentists managing a defective direct resin composite restoration (posterior occlusal Class I; standardized vignette of a 30-year-old,…
For a defective composite restoration with disruption of occlusal integrity, surveyed dentists most often preferred repair over replacement (pooled RR 0.37; p < 0.001); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open margin
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 5.15 [3.98, 6.66]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1: partial loss or fracture of the restoration
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 4.09 [2.77, 6.04]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.45 [1.73, 3.48]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6: corrosion
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.54 [1.12, 2.12]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open margin · Dentists managing a defective direct amalgam restoration (posterior occlusal Class I; standardized vignette of a 30-year-old,…
For a defective amalgam restoration with open margin, surveyed dentists most often preferred replacement over repair (pooled RR 5.14; p < 0.001); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4: marginal discoloration
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.66 [1.09, 2.54]
6 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss of dental hard substance adjacent to the restoration
The intervention showed no clear difference in composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.85 [0.72, 1.00]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss of dental hard substance adjacent to the restoration
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.66 [0.49, 0.90]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1: partial loss or fracture of the restoration
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.70 [0.60, 0.81]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1: partial loss or fracture of the restoration
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 3.85 [2.51, 5.93]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1: partial loss or fracture of the restoration
The intervention showed no clear difference in composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.86 [0.74, 1.00]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open margin
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 3.71 [2.01, 6.82]
11 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6: superficial discoloration
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.34 [0.24, 0.49]
2 studies
GRADE not reported