Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,695 questions · 4,979 findings · 433 reviews

No studies found 998 · 20%GRADE not reported 1,140 · 22.9%Very low 1,024 · 20.6%Low 1,029 · 20.7%Moderate 636 · 12.8%High 152 · 3.1%

Aciclovir (oral or intravenous) for treatment vs placebo

Patient quality of life · Patients being treated for cancer with established oral HSV infection (bone marrow transplant recipients / immunocompromised)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Aciclovir (oral or intravenous) for treatment vs placebo

Adverse effects · Patients being treated for cancer with established oral HSV infection (bone marrow transplant recipients / immunocompromised)
1 finding from 1 review

FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) vs QUETIAPINE

Clinically important response (defined by study) ‐ short term (up to 12 weeks) decreased rate of BPRS score < 20% · patients with schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) changes clinically important response (defined by study) ‐ short term (up to… compared with QUETIAPINE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) vs OLANZAPINE

Clinically important response (defined by study) ‐ short term (up to 12 weeks) decreased rate of PANSS score < 40%, decreased rate of BPRS score < 40% · patients with schizophrenia

It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE (ORAL) changes clinically important response (defined by study) ‐ short term (up to… compared with OLANZAPINE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review