Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

264 questions in 10 reviews · Other oral health

current versions
No studies 45 · 17%Ungraded 127 · 48.1%Very low 24 · 9.1%Low 46 · 17.4%Moderate 13 · 4.9%High 9 · 3.4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
GTR rm + CAF vs GTR nrm + CAF
Aesthetic condition change related to patient's opinion · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
Aesthetic condition change was not reported for this comparison0 studiesNo studies
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Clinical attachment level change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD -0.52 [-1.34, 0.30]2 studiesUngraded
Pedicled buccal fat pad flap (PBFPF) vs Buccal flap (BF)
Successful (complete) closure of oro-antral communication · People of any age with oro-antral communications, fistulae, or both caused by dental procedures · One month after surgery
Interventions for treating oro‐antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.00 [0.83, 1.20]1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Pedicled buccal fat pad flap (PBFPF) vs Buccal flap (BF)
Time required for healing · People of any age with oro-antral communications, fistulae, or both caused by dental procedures
Interventions for treating oro‐antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
ADMG + CAF vs CAF
Clinical attachment level change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.51 [-0.25, 1.27]2 studies · 50 participantsLow
XCM + CAF vs CAF
Gingival recession depth change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.40 [0.11, 0.68]2 studies · 104 participantsLow
GTR rm + CAF vs GTR nrm + CAF
Sites with complete root coverage · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
OR 1.33 [0.46, 3.85]2 studiesUngraded
EMP + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Clinical attachment change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD -0.25 [-0.69, 0.20]2 studies · 62 participantsLow
XCM + CAF vs CAF
Keratinized tissue width change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.44 [0.04, 0.85]2 studies · 104 participantsLow
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF vs GTR rm + CAF
Clinical attachment level change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.76 [-0.01, 1.54]2 studiesUngraded
ADMG + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Clinical attachment level change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD -0.53 [-1.14, 0.08]4 studies · 100 participantsLow
EMP + CAF vs CAF
Clinical attachment level change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.22 [-0.02, 0.45]3 studies · 136 participantsLow
EMP + CAF vs CAF
Gingival recession depth change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.07 [-0.25, 0.40]3 studies · 136 participantsLow
EMP + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Occurrence of adverse effects or postoperative complications · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
McGuire 2012: patient-reported discomfort statistically significantly higher for SCTG than EMP + CAF, only at 1 month postoperatively1 studyUngraded
PRF + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Clinical attachment level change · Adult patients with multiple recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD -0.37 [-0.69, -0.06]2 studiesUngraded
PRF + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Gingival recession depth change · Adult patients with multiple recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD -0.01 [-0.89, 0.86]2 studiesUngraded
ADMG + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Sites with complete root coverage · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
OR 0.43 [0.13, 1.37]2 studies · 50 participantsLow
EMP + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Keratinized tissue change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD -1.06 [-1.36, -0.76]2 studies · 62 participantsVery low
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Keratinized tissue width change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD -2.38 [-2.84, -1.92]2 studiesUngraded
EMP + CAF vs CAF
Keratinized tissue width change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.35 [0.13, 0.56]3 studies · 136 participantsLow
GTR rm + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Patients' preference for a specific procedure · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
Wang 2001: participants reported greater overall satisfaction with GTR rm than SCTG (reduced treatment time, no need for a second surgical site)1 studyUngraded
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF vs GTR rm + CAF
Aesthetic condition change related to patient's opinion · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
Aesthetic condition change was not reported for this comparison0 studiesNo studies
Non-surgical technique A vs Non-surgical technique B
Outcome NR · People of any age with oro-antral communications, fistulae, or both caused by dental procedures
Interventions for treating oro‐antral communications and fistulae due to dental procedures (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Aesthetic condition change related to patient's opinion · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
Rosetti 2013: patient satisfaction survey indicated all patients satisfied with aesthetic results of both procedures at 18 months; no significant differences between 18- and 30-month assessments1 studyUngraded
GTR rm + CAF vs GTR nrm + CAF
Occurrence of adverse effects or postoperative complications · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
Roccuzzo 1996: membrane exposure reported between the first and second weeks of healing1 studyUngraded
ADMG + CAF vs CAF
Aesthetic condition change related to patient's opinion · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
Aesthetic condition change related to patient's opinion: Not reported (SoF 2)0 studiesNo studies
GTR rm + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Sites with complete root coverage · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
OR 0.61 [0.30, 1.24]3 studies · 98 participantsLow
XCM + CAF vs CAF
Clinical attachment level change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.37 [-0.09, 0.83]2 studies · 104 participantsLow
XCM + CAF vs CAF
Occurrence of adverse effects or postoperative complications · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
Jepsen 2013: no differences regarding pain and discomfort between XCM + CAF and CAF (for all defects)1 studyUngraded
GTR rm + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Keratinized tissue change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD -1.77 [-2.66, -0.89]3 studies · 98 participantsVery low
EMP + CAF vs CAF
Clinical attachment level change (short and medium term) · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short and medium term (6 to 24 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD 0.35 [0.09, 0.61]3 studiesUngraded
EMP + CAF vs SCTG + CAF
Gingival recession change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm) · Short term (6 to 12 months)
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects (2018) · Cochrane
MD -0.39 [-1.27, 0.48]2 studies · 62 participantsVery low
Systemic interventions (aciclovir, thalidomide, corticosteroids, rebamipide, etanercept, colchicine, interferon-alpha) vs Placebo
Safety of the intervention including adverse effects · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
SoF 2 (systemic interventions vs placebo), grouped comment spanning all four listed outcomes (verbatim; the review's wording "topical" is a typo for systemic): "8 placebo-controlled trials evaluated topical…NRUngraded
Sucralfate suspension (topical) vs Placebo suspension
Mean duration of episodes · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · End of treatment
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
MD -1.00 [-5.69, 3.69]1 study · 35 participantsUngraded
Interferon-alpha (topical lozenges, 1000 IU or 2000 IU) vs Placebo
Total ulcer burden · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
Kilic 2009 (interferon-alpha lozenges 1000 IU or 2000 IU vs placebo, 84 patients; high risk of selective reporting): the data presented did not allow analysis; authors reported no statistically significant difference…1 study · 84 participantsUngraded
Interferon-alpha (topical lozenges) vs Placebo
Quality of life · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
Kilic 2009 described the use of a quality of life assessment tool but did not report any quality of life data.1 study · 84 participantsUngraded
Systemic interventions (aciclovir, thalidomide, corticosteroids, rebamipide, etanercept, colchicine, interferon-alpha) vs Placebo
Episode duration associated with oral ulcers · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
SoF 2 (systemic interventions vs placebo), grouped comment spanning all four listed outcomes (verbatim; the review's wording "topical" is a typo for systemic): "8 placebo-controlled trials evaluated topical…NRUngraded
Triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% ointment (topical) vs Phenytoin syrup mouthwash (30 mg in 5 mL)
Positive response (not defined) · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · 7 days
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.63 [1.13, 2.34]1 study · 60 participantsUngraded
Cyclosporin (systemic; 10 mg/kg/day) vs Colchicine (systemic; 1 mg daily)
Safety of the intervention including adverse effects · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
Masuda 1989: multiple adverse events in the cyclosporin arm; 3 patients withdrew and 9 had a dose reduction as a result.1 study · 92 participantsUngraded
Colchicine (systemic; 0.5 mg weight-adjusted daily) vs Placebo
Total number of oral ulcers · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · 24 months
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
MD 2.30 [-3.42, 8.02]1 study · 115 participantsModerate
Systemic interventions (aciclovir, thalidomide, corticosteroids, rebamipide, etanercept, colchicine, interferon-alpha) vs Placebo
Pain associated with oral ulcers · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
SoF 2 (systemic interventions vs placebo), grouped comment spanning all four listed outcomes (verbatim; the review's wording "topical" is a typo for systemic): "8 placebo-controlled trials evaluated topical…NRUngraded
Sucralfate suspension (topical) vs Placebo suspension
Healing time · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · End of treatment (3 months)
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
MD -1.09 [-2.61, 0.43]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Sucralfate suspension (topical) vs Placebo suspension
Number of episodes · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · End of treatment
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
MD 1.40 [-0.15, 2.95]1 study · 35 participantsUngraded
Sucralfate suspension (topical) vs Placebo suspension
Pain (0-3 scale) · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · End of treatment (3 months)
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
MD -0.38 [-0.87, 0.11]1 study · 30 participantsUngraded
Aciclovir (systemic; 800 mg 5x/day for 1 week then 400 mg 2x/day for 11 weeks) vs Placebo
Frequency of oral ulcers · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
Davies 1988 (aciclovir vs placebo, 36 patients, cross-over; high risk of reporting bias; concomitant treatments): data were not presented in a usable format; authors reported no statistically significant difference in…1 study · 36 participantsUngraded
Interferon-alpha (topical; hydrogel or lozenges) vs Placebo
Total number of oral ulcers · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · 24 weeks (duration of treatment)
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
MD 1.50 [-10.43, 13.43]1 study · 61 participantsUngraded
Cyclosporin A in orabase (topical) vs Placebo (orabase)
Safety of the intervention including adverse effects · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
Ergun 1997: no adverse effects were seen.1 study · 24 participantsUngraded
Interferon-alpha (systemic; 6 x 10^6 IU subcutaneously 3x/week for 3 months) vs Placebo (subcutaneous)
Duration and pain of oral ulceration · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
Alpsoy 2002 (subcutaneous interferon-alpha 6 x 10^6 IU 3x/week for 3 months vs placebo, 50 patients; high risk of reporting bias): data were not presented in a usable format; authors reported a statistically…1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Rebamipide (systemic; 300 mg daily) vs Placebo
Global aphthae count and pain score · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;…
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
Matsuda 2003 (rebamipide 300 mg daily vs placebo, 35 patients; high risk of reporting bias; concomitant treatments): authors stated that rebamipide improved the global evaluation aphthae count and global evaluation…1 study · 35 participantsUngraded
Etanercept (systemic; 25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly for 4 weeks) vs Placebo (subcutaneous)
Mean number of oral ulcers · People with Behcet's disease with a history of recurrent oral aphthous-type (RAS-type) ulcers diagnosed clinically;… · Males only
Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease (2014) · Cochrane
Melikoglu 2005 (etanercept 25 mg s.c. twice weekly for 4 weeks vs placebo, 40 male patients; high risk of reporting bias): authors reported a statistically significant difference in mean number of oral ulcers with…1 study · 40 participantsUngraded