What do systematic reviews say?

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Active tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic word‐retrieval training

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 3 participants
  Very low

Active tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 6 participants
  Very low

Active tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Active tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Active tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Active tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus phonological word‐retrieval training

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 6 participants
  Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 37 participants
  Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 93 participants
  Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 28 participants
  Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 37 participants
  Very low

Active tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training vs sham tDCS plus semantic and phonological word‐retrieval training

• Non‐pharmacological interventions for improving language and communication in people with primary progressive aphasia 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 16 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings for spaced retrieval combined with errorless learning training programme for people with dementia vs spaced retrieval only training programme

• Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 60 participants
  Very low

Summary of findings for spaced retrieval combined with errorless learning training programme for people with dementia vs spaced retrieval only training programme

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings for spaced retrieval combined with errorless learning training programme for people with dementia vs spaced retrieval only training programme

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings for spaced retrieval combined with errorless learning training programme for people with dementia vs spaced retrieval only training programme

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Complex information, support and training interventions vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)

• Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  9 studies · 597 participants
  Moderate

Complex information, support and training interventions vs information only

Complex information, support and training interventions probably leads to higher dropouts for any reason compared with information provision only (moderate certainty).

• Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.51 [1.04, 2.2]
  12 studies · 1266 participants
  Moderate