Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

180 questions · 184 findings · 19 reviews

No studies found 51 · 27.7%GRADE not reported 40 · 21.7%Very low 22 · 12%Low 38 · 20.7%Moderate 22 · 12%High 11 · 6%

Intervention not reported

Number of participants with clinically significant bleeding (0 to 3 months) · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem…

The intervention showed no clear difference in number of participants with clinically significant bleeding (0 to 3… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Serious infections (0 to 3 months) · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem…

The intervention showed no clear difference in serious infections (0 to 3 months) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Hospital readmission (0 to 3 months) · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem…

The intervention showed no clear difference in hospital readmission (0 to 3 months) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 19 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy

The intervention showed no clear difference in overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 19 pairwise… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Time to initiation of first subsequent therapy · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Quality of life (QoL) We reported this outcome narratively in this review. Here, long‐term results (i.e., at the end of treatment) are presented. In the comparison PAZ versus SUN, QoL was measured using FACIT‐F (score range 0‐52; higher scores rep... · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Time to initiation of first subsequent therapy · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and an intermediate or poor risk according to the International…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Serious adverse events (SAEs) ‐ Network included 31 pairwise comparisons ‐ Mean risk with SUN across trials3 included in this network: 40.7% · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy

The intervention showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (SAEs) ‐ Network included 31 pairwise… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Progression‐free survival (PFS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 27 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy

The intervention probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (PFS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 27… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Adverse events (AEs) (grade 3 or 4) ‐ Network included 19 pairwise comparisons ‐ Mean risk with SUN across trials3 in this network: 70.6% · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (combined risk groups) without previous systemic anticancer therapy
1 finding from 1 review

Thrombopoietin mimetics vs placebo or usual care

Number of participants with at least 1 bleeding episode · people with haematological disorders undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation

It is very uncertain whether thrombopoietin mimetics changes number of participants with at least 1 bleeding episode compared with placebo or standard care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Number of participants with severe or life‐threatening bleeding · people with haematological disorders undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes number of participants with severe or life‐threatening bleeding (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review