Number of incontinent men after 12 months ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback showed no clear difference in number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment; (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Urinary Incontinence Score (ICI‐SF) ‐ after first year · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ FES versus ExMI · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
It is very uncertain whether treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment changes number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months ‐ FES versus ExMI compared with another active treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Treatment of UI after radical: one active treatment showed no clear difference in adverse events PFMT + Anal EStim versus PFMT alone compared with another active treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Economic analysis using QALY · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Number of incontinent men ‐ within 3 to 6 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
It is very uncertain whether treatment of UI after radical: combinations of treatments changes number of incontinent men with 3 to 6 months compared with no treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events ‐ PFMT + anal EStim + BFB · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Treatment of UI after radical: combinations of treatments showed no clear difference in adverse events ‐ PFMT + anal EStim + BFB compared with no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Treatment of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy probably leads to lower number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Urinary Incontinence Score (ICI‐SF) ‐ after first year · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life Score assessed using (ICIQ‐SF) or (ICIQ‐SF UI score) · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Treatment of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with no treatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review