Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

189 questions · 192 findings · 19 reviews

No studies found 35 · 18.2%GRADE not reported 5 · 2.6%Very low 27 · 14.1%Low 64 · 33.3%Moderate 44 · 22.9%High 17 · 8.9%

Non‐platinum single‐agent vs non‐platinum combination treatment

Grade 3 and 4 hematological adverse events (AE) ‐ anemia · non‐small cell lung cancer in the elderly population

It is very uncertain whether non‐platinum single‐agent changes grade 3 and 4 hematological adverse events (AE) ‐ anemia compared with non‐platinum combination treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐platinum single‐agent vs non‐platinum combination treatment

Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia · non‐small cell lung cancer in the elderly population

Non‐platinum single‐agent may leads to higher grade 3 and 4 hematological adverse events (AE) ‐ neutropenia compared with non‐platinum combination treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐platinum single‐agent vs non‐platinum combination treatment

Safety (AE, adverse drug reaction): thrombocytopenia Grades 3 or 4 according to National Cancer Institute · non‐small cell lung cancer in the elderly population

It is very uncertain whether non‐platinum single‐agent changes grade 3 and 4 hematological adverse events (AE) ‐ thrombocytopenia compared with non‐platinum combination treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Amifostine vs no otoprotective intervention

Ototoxicity according to NCI CTC v2 criteria with intra‐arterial platinum (combined asymptomatic and symptomatic disease) Exact test method not reported · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Amifostine showed no clear difference in ototoxicity according to NCICTCv2 criteria with intra‐arterial… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sodium thiosulfate vs no otoprotective intervention

Ototoxicity according to Brock criteria with intravenous platinum (combined asymptomatic and symptomatic disease) · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Sodium thiosulfate probably leads to lower ototoxicity according to Brock criteria with intravenous platinum… compared with no otoprotective intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sodium thiosulfate vs no otoprotective intervention

Overall survival with intravenous platinum (i.e. mortality/number of participants deceased) · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Sodium thiosulfate showed no clear difference in overall survival with intravenous platinum (i.e. mortality/number of… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sodium thiosulfate vs no otoprotective intervention

Event‐free survival · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Sodium thiosulfate showed no clear difference in event‐free survival with intravenous platinum (i.e. number of… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sodium thiosulfate vs no otoprotective intervention

Tumour response with intravenous platinum (complete and partial remission) · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Sodium thiosulfate showed no clear difference in tumour response with intravenous platinum (complete and partial… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Amifostine vs no otoprotective intervention

Ototoxicity according to NCI CTC v2 criteria with intravenous platinum (combined asymptomatic and symptomatic disease) Objective and subjective audiometric evaluations were performed, no further information provided · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Amifostine showed no clear difference in ototoxicity according to NCICTCv2 criteria with intravenous platinum… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Amifostine vs no otoprotective intervention

Ototoxicity according to modified Brock criteria with intravenous platinum (combined asymptomatic and symptomatic disease) Audiograms were performed, but no further information provided · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Amifostine showed no clear difference in ototoxicity according to modified Brock criteria with intravenous… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Amifostine vs no otoprotective intervention

Tumour response with intra‐arterial platinum (good and partial remission) · children with cancer treated with platinum‐based therapy

Amifostine showed no clear difference in tumour response with intra‐arterial platinum (good and partial… compared with no otoprotective intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Taxane‐platinum‐fluoropyrimidine combinations vs taxane‐platinum (without fluoropyrimidine)

Progression‐free survival · people with advanced gastric cancer

Taxane‐platinum‐fluoropyrimidine combinations probably leads to lower progression‐free survival compared with taxane‐platinum (without fluoropyrimidine) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Taxane‐platinum‐fluoropyrimidine combinations vs taxane‐platinum (without fluoropyrimidine)

Treatment‐related death · people with advanced gastric cancer

It is very uncertain whether taxane‐platinum‐fluoropyrimidine combinations changes treatment‐related death compared with taxane‐platinum (without fluoropyrimidine) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review