Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

699 questions · 745 findings · 185 reviews

No studies found 180 · 24.2%GRADE not reported 76 · 10.2%Very low 194 · 26%Low 154 · 20.7%Moderate 110 · 14.8%High 31 · 4.2%

Ion-releasing restoration, glass ionomer-based (conventional GIC, HV-GIC, RMGIC, glass hybrid) vs Resin composite restoration

Marginal adaptation (unacceptable marginal adaptation) · Patients with permanent dentition in need of restorations (all cavity types: Black's Class I, II, V, and non-carious cervical lesions)

Across follow-up periods, there was no statistically significant difference in unacceptable marginal adaptation between GIC and resin composite restorations.

6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings

Intervention not reported

Invitation versus control: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening

The intervention probably leads to higher invitation versus control: uptake of screening (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

GP invitation letter versus invitation letter from other authority sources: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes GP invitation letter versus invitation letter from other authority… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Personal invitation versus invitation letter: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening

The intervention may leads to higher personal invitation versus invitation letter: uptake of screening (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Letter with fixed appointment versus letter with open invitation to make appointment: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening

The intervention probably leads to higher letter with fixed appointment versus letter with open invitation to… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Counselling versus control: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes counselling versus control: uptake of screening (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Counselling versus other: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes counselling versus other: uptake of screening (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Education versus control: uptake of screening · women for cervical screening

The intervention may leads to higher education versus control: uptake of screening (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Counter-stimulation and distraction (combined) vs Conventional treatment

Acceptance of LA · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) vs other local anaesthetic

Self- or observational assessment of intraoperative distress/pain/acceptance of treatment during provision of LA: pain-related behaviour (any disruptive behaviour/sudden reaction/movement) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review

Video modelling acclimatisation for LA vs Oral hygiene video

Self- or observational assessment of intraoperative distress/pain/acceptance of treatment during provision of LA: anxiety/pain experience (VAS, higher scores indicate worsened anxiety) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

Video modelling acclimatisation for LA may leads to lower self- or observational assessment of intraoperative… compared with oral hygiene video (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Video modelling acclimatisation for LA vs Oral hygiene video

Acceptance of LA · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Counter-stimulation and distraction (combined) vs Conventional treatment

Self- or observational assessment of intraoperative distress/pain/acceptance of treatment during provision of LA (SEM scale, distress) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia
1 finding from 1 review

The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) vs Sleeper One (electronic LA delivery system)

Acceptance of LA · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical counter-stimulation device (DentalVibe) vs Conventional treatment (no stimulation)

Acceptance of LA · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hypnosis vs Conventional treatment

Acceptance of LA · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hypnosis vs Conventional treatment

Intraoperative pain · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

It is very uncertain whether hypnosis changes self- or observational assessment of intraoperative… compared with conventional treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical counter-stimulation device (DentalVibe) vs Conventional treatment (no stimulation)

Intraoperative pain · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

It is very uncertain whether electrical counter-stimulation device (DentalVibe) changes self- or observational assessment of intraoperative… compared with conventional treatment (no stimulation) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Audiovisual distraction vs Conventional treatment

Self- or observational assessment of intraoperative distress/pain/acceptance of treatment during provision of LA: pain-related behaviour during LA (negative vs positive behaviour; Frankl Behaviour Rating Scale) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia

It is very uncertain whether audiovisual distraction changes self- or observational assessment of intraoperative… compared with conventional treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review