Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

285 questions · 327 findings · 36 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 129 · 39.4%GRADE not reported 11 · 3.4%Very low 82 · 25.1%Low 64 · 19.6%Moderate 38 · 11.6%High 3 · 0.9%

Endoscopic surgery vs open surgery

Adverse events (infection, dysaesthesia) · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether endoscopic surgery changes adverse events (infection, dysaesthesia) compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endoscopic surgery vs open surgery

Neurovascular injury · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether endoscopic surgery changes neurovascular injury compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Resolution of symptoms · patients with trigger finger

Percutaneous surgery showed no clear difference in resolution of symptoms compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Recurrence · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes recurrence compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or pulley injury, oedema or inflammation or hematoma, adherence) · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or… compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Septic abdominal complications (presence or absence) Clinical definition · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in septic abdominal complications (presence or absence) Clinical… compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Pulmonary complications (0 to 30 days) · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in pulmonary complications (presence or absence) compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery vs phacoemulsification alone

Proportion of participants who were medication‐free (not using eye drops) medium‐term · people with open‐angle glaucoma

Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery probably leads to higher proportion of participants who were medication‐free (not using… compared with phacoemulsification alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery vs phacoemulsification alone

Mean change in unmedicated IOP24 months (medium‐term) · people with open‐angle glaucoma

Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery showed no clear difference in mean change in unmedicated IOP24 months (medium‐term) compared with phacoemulsification alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery vs phacoemulsification alone

Mean change in daily IOP‐lowering medicationsat 24 months (medium‐term) · people with open‐angle glaucoma

Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery showed no clear difference in mean change in daily IOP‐lowering medicationsat 24 months… compared with phacoemulsification alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review