Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

323 questions · 366 findings · 43 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 135 · 36.9%GRADE not reported 40 · 10.9%Very low 85 · 23.2%Low 65 · 17.8%Moderate 38 · 10.4%High 3 · 0.8%

Endoscopic surgery vs open surgery

Function Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Endoscopic surgery vs open surgery

Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Endoscopic surgery vs open surgery

Recurrence ‐ not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Endoscopic surgery vs open surgery

Adverse events (infection, dysaesthesia) · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether endoscopic surgery changes adverse events (infection, dysaesthesia) compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.74 [0.74, 10.06]
1 study · 231 participants
Very low

Endoscopic surgery vs open surgery

Neurovascular injury · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether endoscopic surgery changes neurovascular injury compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.08 [0.13, 74.79]
1 study · 231 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Resolution of symptoms · patients with trigger finger

Percutaneous surgery showed no clear difference in resolution of symptoms compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.97, 1.02]
5 studies · 429 participants
Low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Pain (1 to 6 scale) · patients with trigger finger

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 36 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Function Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Participant global assessment of success Not measured · patients with trigger finger

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Recurrence · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes recurrence compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.28 [0.01, 6.83]
4 studies · 397 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or pulley injury, oedema or inflammation or hematoma, adherence) · patients with trigger finger

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or… compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.8 [0.17, 3.68]
5 studies · 429 participants
Very low

Percutaneous surgery vs open surgery

Neurovascular injury · patients with trigger finger

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for trigger finger 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 397 participants
Very low

Open surgical exposure vs Closed surgical exposure

Discomfort/pain · People with maxillary palatally displaced (impacted) canines, unilateral or bilateral (children/adolescents; mean ages 14.2 to 17.5 years)

1 finding from 1 review

Open versus closed surgical exposure of canine teeth that are displaced in the roof of the mouth 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 to 10 days postoperative
SoF (Patient response, pain and discomfort reported in different ways between 1 to 10 days postoperatively): 'This outcome was measured in a variety of ways in the studies that cannot be pooled'; quality very low…
2 studies
Very low

Open surgical exposure vs Closed surgical exposure

Success of surgery (eruption of the canine crown sufficient for orthodontic alignment, without repeated surgery) · People with maxillary palatally displaced (impacted) canines, unilateral or bilateral (children/adolescents; mean ages 14.2 to 17.5 years)

Open surgical exposure showed no clear difference in success of surgery (eruption of the canine crown sufficient for… compared with closed surgical exposure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Open versus closed surgical exposure of canine teeth that are displaced in the roof of the mouth 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
10 days postoperative
RR 0.99 [0.93, 1.06]
3 studies · 141 participants
Low

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Septic abdominal complications (presence or absence) Clinical definition · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in septic abdominal complications (presence or absence) Clinical… compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.66 [0.3, 1.47]
2 studies · 214 participants
Low

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Pulmonary complications (0 to 30 days) · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in pulmonary complications (presence or absence) compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.52 [0.08, 3.55]
3 studies · 315 participants
Low

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Surgical site infection · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in surgical site infection compared with open surgery (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.28 [0.08, 1]
3 studies · 315 participants
Moderate

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Suture dehiscence · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in suture dehiscence compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.52 [0.29, 7.98]
3 studies · 315 participants
Low

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Postoperative ileus · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

Laparoscopic surgery showed no clear difference in postoperative ileus compared with open surgery (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.54 [0.16, 1.8]
3 studies · 315 participants
Low

Laparoscopic vs open surgery

Intra‐abdominal abscess · patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease

It is very uncertain whether laparoscopic surgery changes intra‐abdominal abscess compared with open surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.15 [0.33, 4.03]
3 studies · 315 participants
Very low