Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6: superficial discoloration
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.22 [0.08, 0.59]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1: partial loss or fracture of the restoration
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 1:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.70 [0.60, 0.82]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6: superficial discoloration
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.29 [0.18, 0.45]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6: superficial discoloration
The intervention led to lower composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.30 [0.18, 0.50]
11 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss of dental hard substance adjacent to the restoration
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.46 [5.43, 7.68]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open margin
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 4.98 [4.07, 6.09]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss of dental hard substance adjacent to the restoration
The intervention showed no clear difference in composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 2: loss…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.93 [0.68, 1.27]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.51 [4.64, 9.13]
11 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open margin
The intervention showed no clear difference in composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.36 [0.15, 12.30]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 8.20 [6.93, 9.70]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4: marginal discoloration
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.55 [1.79, 3.62]
7 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6: corrosion
The intervention showed no clear difference in amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.09 [0.86, 1.38]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6: corrosion
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 6:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.60 [1.22, 2.10]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.16 [4.45, 8.52]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4: marginal discoloration
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 4:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.88 [2.31, 3.58]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open margin
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 5.26 [3.58, 7.71]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.98 [2.23, 3.98]
10 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 8: disruption of occlusal integrity
The intervention showed no clear difference in composite: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 8:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.31 [0.08, 1.13]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3: secondary caries
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 3:…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 6.64 [4.83, 9.11]
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open margin
The intervention led to higher amalgam: Preference for replacement over repair - Scenario 5: open…; GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
RR 3.87 [2.18, 6.86]
2 studies
GRADE not reported