Intervention not reported
Finding 5. Patients and healthcare providers described several factors that might affect patients’ motivation and engagement with telerehabilitation services, including support from healthcare providers or family members and other caregivers durin...
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate
Intervention not reported
Finding 6. Patients, caregivers, and providers described a number of privacy and confidentiality issues when services were provided at home. These included the increased privacy of being able to exercise at home but also the loss of privacy when e...
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Finding 9. Healthcare providers highlighted the importance of personalising the service to each patient’s needs and resources at home.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Finding 10. Patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders described how telerehabilitation changed the nature of the patient‐provider relationship. This included overcoming physical barriers to communication and enabling quick ...
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Finding 11. Healthcare providers and patients described some aspects of telerehabilitation services at home as challenging. Healthcare providers described problems in assessing patients, their environment, and whether they were performing exercise...
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Finding 12. Patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and other stakeholders regarded telerehabilitation as an opportunity to make rehabilitation services more accessible.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Place of death (home) · people referred for end‐of‐life care
The intervention leads to higher place of death (home) (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Unplanned admission to hospital · people referred for end‐of‐life care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Participant health outcomes, including control of symptoms · people referred for end‐of‐life care
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes participant health outcomes, including control of symptoms (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Patient satisfaction · people referred for end‐of‐life care
The intervention may leads to lower patient satisfaction (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Caregiver outcomes · people referred for end‐of‐life care
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes caregiver outcomes (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Staff views on the provision of services · people referred for end‐of‐life care
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Health service resource use and cost · people referred for end‐of‐life care
1 finding from 1 review
Recovery during intervention defined as achieving WHZ ≥ −2 and absence of oedema in 1 study; reaching a WHZ score > −2 and without oedema in 1 study; WHZ > −2 in 1 study; having a WHZ score ≥ 0 in 1 study; reaching 100% weight for height in 1 stud... · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial
Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose… probably leads to higher recovery during intervention defined as achieving WHZ ≥ −2 and… compared with an alternative dietary approach (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Relapse during intervention defined as admission to inpatient therapeutic care, remain wasted, and dropouts during intervention period · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial
Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) leads to lower relapse during intervention defined as admission to inpatient… compared with RUTF using an alternative formulation (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mortality during intervention · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial
Standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) showed no clear difference in mortality during intervention compared with RUTF using an alternative formulation (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Rate of weight gain (g/kg/day) · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial
1 finding from 1 review
Relapse during intervention defined as admission to inpatient therapeutic care or recurrence of oedema or systematic infections during the study period, and dropouts during intervention period · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial
It is very uncertain whether standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose… changes relapse during intervention defined as admission to inpatient… compared with an alternative dietary approach (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mortality during intervention · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial
It is very uncertain whether standard ready‐to‐use therapeutic food (RUTF) provided at a dose… changes mortality during intervention compared with an alternative dietary approach (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Rate of weight gain (g/kg/day) · children aged 6 months‐5 years with SAM (and mixed HIV comorbidity), some of whom had been stabilised as inpatients pre‐trial
1 finding from 1 review