Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,256 questions · 2,339 findings · 262 reviews

No studies found 555 · 23.7%GRADE not reported 398 · 17%Very low 572 · 24.5%Low 476 · 20.4%Moderate 240 · 10.3%High 98 · 4.2%

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Functional outcomes · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)
3 findings from 1 review

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Neurological impairment · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Stroke‐related mortality · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)

General anaesthesia showed no clear difference in stroke‐related mortality compared with non‐general anaesthesia (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Intracranial haemorrhage · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Time to revascularisation · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

General anaesthesia vs non‐general anaesthesia

Target artery revascularisation (dichotomous; mTICI 2b–3) · acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment (long‐term)

General anaesthesia probably leads to higher target artery revascularisation (dichotomous; mTICI 2b–3) compared with non‐general anaesthesia (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review