Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

83 questions · 93 findings · 8 reviews

No studies found 7 · 7.5%GRADE not reported 13 · 14%Very low 5 · 5.4%Low 47 · 50.5%Moderate 21 · 22.6%High 0 · 0%

Red blood cell transfusion vs no transfusion

Erythrocyte alloantibody formation Laboratory assessment · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

It is very uncertain whether red blood cell transfusion changes erythrocyte alloantibody formation Laboratory assessment compared with non‐transfusion (Comparison 2) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Muromonab‐CD3 (T cell) vs other antibody (stratified by comparator)

Failure of acute rejection reversal · kidney transplant recipients: first rejection episode

Muromonab‐CD3 (T cell) showed no clear difference in failure of acute rejection reversal compared with other antibody (stratified by comparator) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Muromonab‐CD3 (T cell) vs other antibody (stratified by comparator)

Recurrent rejection · kidney transplant recipients: first rejection episode

Muromonab‐CD3 (T cell) showed no clear difference in recurrent rejection compared with other antibody (stratified by comparator) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Muromonab‐CD3 (T cell) vs other antibody (stratified by comparator)

Treatment adverse events: fever, chills, malaise after drug administration · kidney transplant recipients: first rejection episode

Muromonab‐CD3 (T cell) may leads to higher treatment adverse events: fever, chills, malaise after drug… compared with other antibody (stratified by comparator) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Muromonab‐CD3 (T cell) vs other antibody (stratified by comparator)

Neurological adverse effects · kidney transplant recipients: first rejection episode

Muromonab‐CD3 (T cell) may leads to higher treatment adverse events: neurological side effects compared with other antibody (stratified by comparator) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)

Adverse effects · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
10 findings from 1 review
Show 7 more findings

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)

Progression‐free survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard… showed no clear difference in progression-free survival compared with standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy); GRADE not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)

Participant satisfaction · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)

Costs (direct and indirect) · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)

Overall survival · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard… probably leads to lower overall survival compared with standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)

Locoregional control · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard… probably leads to lower locoregional control compared with standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)

Quality of life · People with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx
1 finding from 1 review

Dinutuximab‐containing immunotherapy vs usual care

Overall survival (reported as mortality) · People with high‐risk neuroblastoma pre‐treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Dinutuximab‐containing immunotherapy probably leads to lower overall survival (reported as mortality) compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dinutuximab‐containing immunotherapy vs usual care

Treatment‐related mortality ‐ not reported · People with high‐risk neuroblastoma pre‐treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Dinutuximab‐containing immunotherapy vs usual care

Progression‐free survival ‐ not reported · People with high‐risk neuroblastoma pre‐treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Dinutuximab‐containing immunotherapy vs usual care

Event‐free survival · People with high‐risk neuroblastoma pre‐treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Dinutuximab‐containing immunotherapy probably leads to lower event‐free survival (reported as relapse, progressive disease,… compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dinutuximab‐containing immunotherapy vs usual care

Late non‐haematological toxicity ‐ not reported · People with high‐risk neuroblastoma pre‐treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Dinutuximab‐containing immunotherapy vs usual care

Health‐related quality of life ‐ not reported · People with high‐risk neuroblastoma pre‐treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review